A peculiar chain of action and reaction in new state-level laws is appearing across the U.S. When the Republican-led state of Idaho enacted new restrictions on abortion in March, Democratic legislators in neighboring Oregon reacted by approving $15 million for out-of-state residents seeking the procedure. And after Texas created a new legal structure last year setting bounties of up to $10,000 for successful lawsuits against people who violate the state’s abortion laws, California adopted the same bounty structure to reward citizens for successfully suing anyone selling assault weapons or guns without serial numbers. What’s going on?

Philip Rocco is an associate professor of political science at Marquette University in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Rocco says Democratic and Republican state officials are intentionally building divergent and incompatible legal systems. The new laws composing these systems are being drafted by networks of ideologically motivated activist groups, pushing their agendas through partisan state legislatures without much opposition or accountability—or any clear relationship to the will of voters.

As these divergent and incompatible legal systems grow, Rocco says, the quality of any given American’s life could be more profoundly determined by which state they live in—Democratic or Republican, Blue or Red—with opposing systems meaning more and more acute differences in the jobs people can do, the rights and benefits they enjoy, and even the how long they live …


Michael Bluhm: What patterns do you see emerging in these new laws?

Philip Rocco: One is of new regulations governing people’s autonomy over their bodies—and also what parents allow for their children’s. You see this in increasing state restrictions on abortion in the U.S.; you also see it in increasing state regulations on medical interventions for children who understand themselves as being transgender, even when their parents support these interventions—which are much less common, and naturally much more controversial. States are also starting to incentivize people to sue others for violating these various regulations. Which is a new means of regulatory enforcement.

This article is for members only

Join to read on and have access to The Signal‘s full library.

Join now Already have an account? Sign in